Loading...
Help keep this site alive, take a look at one of our sponsors

Welcome to TheBestTrek, thank you for visiting the site, to see everying and to participate in discussions Register, its free, quick and easy to do plus, you get all the benefits.
Pages: [1]   Go Down
Print
Author Topic: Al Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth'? -- $30,000 utility bill  (Read 113 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Kosh GTO
Commodore
Commander
*****

Karma: 222
Offline Offline

Posts: 4593



« on: February 27, 2007, 10:05:06 PM »

(2/27/07 - NASHVILLE, TN) - Back home in Tennessee, safely ensconced in his suburban Nashville home, Vice President Al Gore is no doubt basking in the Oscar awarded to "An Inconvenient Truth," the documentary he inspired and in which he starred. But a local free-market think tank is trying to make that very home emblematic of what it deems Gore's environmental hypocrisy.
Related Links

    * Get E-witness News
    * News, video & alerts on your phone
    * ABC13 E-lert

Also on ABC13.com:
Send news tips | RSS | ABC13 E-lert | Info mentioned on air | Search abc13.com
Armed with Gore's utility bills for the last two years, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research charged Monday that the gas and electric bills for the former vice president's 20-room home and pool house devoured nearly 221,000 kilowatt-hours in 2006, more than 20 times the national average of 10,656 kilowatt-hours.

"If this were any other person with $30,000-a-year in utility bills, I wouldn't care," says the Center's 27-year-old president, Drew Johnson. "But he tells other people how to live and he's not following his own rules."

Scoffed a former Gore adviser in response: "I think what you're seeing here is the last gasp of the global warming skeptics. They've completely lost the debate on the issue so now they're just attacking their most effective opponent."

Kalee Kreider, a spokesperson for the Gores, did not dispute the Center's figures, taken as they were from public records. But she pointed out that both Al and Tipper Gore work out of their home and she argued that "the bottom line is that every family has a different carbon footprint. And what Vice President Gore has asked is for families to calculate that footprint and take steps to reduce and offset it."

A carbon footprint is a calculation of the CO2 fossil fuel emissions each person is responsible for, either directly because of his or her transportation and energy consumption or indirectly because of the manufacture and eventual breakdown of products he or she uses. (You can calculate your own carbon footprint on the website http://www.carbonfootprint.com/)

The vice president has done that, Kreider argues, and the family tries to offset that carbon footprint by purchasing their power through the local Green Power Switch program — electricity generated through renewable resources such as solar, wind, and methane gas, which create less waste and pollution. "In addition, they are in the midst of installing solar panels on their home, which will enable them to use less power," Kreider added. "They also use compact fluorescent bulbs and other energy efficiency measures and then they purchase offsets for their carbon emissions to bring their carbon footprint down to zero."

These efforts did little to impress Johnson. "I appreciate the solar panels," he said, "but he also has natural gas lanterns in his yard, a heated pool, and an electric gate. While I appreciate that he's switching out some light bulbs, he is not living the lifestyle that he advocates."

The Center claims that Nashville Electric Services records show the Gores in 2006 averaged a monthly electricity bill of $1,359 for using 18,414 kilowatt-hours, and $1,461 per month for using 16,200 kilowatt-hours in 2005. During that time, Nashville Gas Company billed the family an average of $536 a month for the main house and $544 for the pool house in 2006, and $640 for the main house and $525 for the pool house in 2005. That averages out to be $29,268 in gas and electric bills for the Gores in 2006, $31,512 in 2005.

The press release from Johnson's group, an obscure conservative think tank founded by Johnson in 2004 when he was 24, was given splashy attention on the highly-trafficked Drudge Report Monday evening, and former Gore aides saw it as part of a piece, along with an Fox News Channel investigation from earlier this month of Gore's use of private planes in 2000. Last year, a seemingly amateurish Youtube video mocking the "An Inconvenient Truth" turned out to have been produced by slick Republican public relations firm called DCI, which just happens to have oil giant Exxon as a client.

"Considering that he spends an overwhelming majority of his time advocating on behalf of and trying to affect change on this issue, it's not surprising that people who have a vested interest in protecting the status quo would go after him," said the former Gore aide.

Kreider says she's confident that the Gores' utility bills will decrease. "They bought an older home and they're in the process of upgrading the home," she said. "Unfortunately that means an increase in energy use in order to have an overall decrease in energy use down the road."

Gore is not the only environmentalist associated with "An Inconvenient Truth" who has come under fire for personal habits -- and not all the criticism has come from the Right.

Writing in The Atlantic Monthly in 2004, liberal writer Eric Alterman criticized producer Laurie David for her use of private Gulfstream jets. David, he wrote "reviles the owners of SUVs as terrorist enablers, yet gives herself a pass when it comes to chartering one of the most wasteful uses of fossil-based fuels imaginable." New Republic writer Gregg Easterbrook followed up, computing that "one cross-country flight in a Gulfstream is the same, in terms of Persian-Gulf dependence and greenhouse-gas emissions, as if she drove a Hummer for an entire year."

In an interview in 2006, David told ABC News that she was limiting her use of private planes and was flying commercial far more frequently.



And yet this person talked ,and made a film, and won an oscar for "how to prevent Gobal warming"??

Start with yourself first.
Logged



Vorlon Home World, And Now who Want some??? And Who Are You !!!!!
Valkyrie
The Shyster
Ambassador
Commander
*****

Karma: 280
Offline Offline

Posts: 12749


AAARGH!!! DON'T LOOK!!!!


« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2007, 10:52:55 PM »

Man in the mirror.  That is the one to look at when you think changes need to happen.
Logged

Kosh GTO
Commodore
Commander
*****

Karma: 222
Offline Offline

Posts: 4593



« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2007, 11:44:07 PM »

Gore's film was in the wrong category and should have been up against movies like Saw II.

And the fantasy designed to scare the hell out of the gullible.
ast night gore may not have known it since he was glowing in thier spotlights.....but he lost any chance he had of being president by becoming one of hollywood's boys........all you have to do is revisit tipper's attacks on hollywood not that long ago.....as well as just link him to hollywood....and that means that the real america will reject him............and besides....look at hussien obama.......he is directly in the crosshairs of hillary........watch your back obama....

I have yet to watch one Oscar show in my sort life,t was always hard to take the Oscars seriously- I couldn't even bring myself to watch it at all this year. Gore is just another nutjob to be ignored until he goes away. I wonder how this will be looked at a few years from now when the environmental loonies are talking about global cooling again- and they have the nerve to try to criticize others about not learning from history....

Here's an interesting experiment for you nutjobs: take a 5 day weather forecast from any newspaper or source that you want- at the end of the week, see how many times they were right about the projected low or high temperature for the day- then explain why we should spend billions based on the prediction of one degree of temperature increase 10 years from now.

The same people who are saying the Bush administration is using scare tactics about terrorists setting off a nuclear bomb in our country are telling us that Manhattan will be under soon be under water- which scenario is more plausible? If you believe in this nonsense, you pay for it- I'll invest my money more wisely- for example, I would gladly pay 50 grand for the opportunity to kick Al Gore in the ass as hard as I can.

I don't dislike Al?? really i don't.I just want him to speak the full truth,and lead by example thank you. and not as do asi say and not as i do.$30.000 a month on fuel bill.
Logged



Vorlon Home World, And Now who Want some??? And Who Are You !!!!!
TC1
Commodore
Commander
*****

Karma: 164
Offline Offline

Posts: 896


« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2007, 12:49:49 AM »

Big Al is just in it for the money and power. His electric bill is more than some people make anually in his home state of Tennessee. Don't take me wrong, I have no problem with the guy making money for his work, but I do have a problem with him telling others how to live and being a hypocrite.
Logged
Valkyrie
The Shyster
Ambassador
Commander
*****

Karma: 280
Offline Offline

Posts: 12749


AAARGH!!! DON'T LOOK!!!!


« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2007, 01:19:10 AM »

I agree with you guys that he shouldn't be a hypocrite.  But one thing I can say is that whether or not there is such a thing as global warming is beside the point.  I think it's important for humans to take better care of the environment.  Less pollution is only a good thing.  We also need to lessen our dependence on fossil fuels.  They will run out one day & if our economies are dependent on them, it is not a good thing unless we have a self contained source of it.  We don't.  We import fossil fuels, ergo we can be held at ransom at any time.  Developing alternate renewable resources is the most sensible method of survival.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Print
Jump to: